?

Log in

Very Interesting Article - In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth

[ website | REOPEN 911 ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Very Interesting Article [Aug. 1st, 2007|02:32 pm]
In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth
911_questions
[jhn1f]
[mood |curiouscurious]

<a href="http://www.911weknow.com/images/stories/documents/finnish_expert_911.pdf">This</a> is a very interesting, and rather frightening report by a Finnish military expert about the wTC collapses.
I'd like to hear other peoples opinions on this.


X-Posted
linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: docwho88
2007-09-01 01:01 am (UTC)
First lie:
The towers took the impacts of crushing Boeing 767's. The towers were originally built to take impacts of Boeing 707's, which are approximately of the same size and was widely used in the 1970's.

a few points:
A) the towers were indeed built to take the impact of 707s. describing them as "approximately the same size" is overtly misleading and inaccurate, especially since momentum increases exponentially with increased mass.
B) the towers were built to withstand the impact of these planes at approach speed, minimally-fuelled (assuming fuel had been dumped for landing). in reality, the towers were struck at crusing speed, aimed for the kill, and with special intent towards having maximum fuel loads.

actual experts who have weighed in on the matter (as opposed to overseas "military experts") have described it as something of a wonder that the towers stood for as long as they did, considering the structural damage they withstood. funnily enough, nobody with actual credentials in structural or fire engineering are surprised at all that the towers fell how and when they did.

I could go on, but it's already overly clear that this "expert" will only continue parroting the same myths and so-forth that have characterized the "truth" movement all along...
(Reply) (Thread)